On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 15:17 -0400, George Boudreau wrote:
> 
> Declan Moriarty wrote:
> > Having built the glibc version of hlfs-svn, I decided to go for the
> > uclibc one largely because I am slowly becoming aware that the libc
> > stuff is a mess in glibc.
> > 
> > I am building under hlfs-20051220 and cooking hlfs-uclibc-svn, mainly

> Are you building with a fully grsec enabled kernel. You mentioned in an 
> earlier post you had disabled both pax and grsecurity in the kernel. Was 
> this lo-security kernel the only way you could get past the 'localedef' 
> issue. I still stall on localedef when doing a hlfs(svn)->hlfs(svn) build.


I gather few (security enabled)hlfs --> hlfs builds have been done. Yes,
I gave up fairly early in the glibc build on a security enabled kernel.

This build I am doing the uclibc version, so I reused the security
enabled hlfs kernel and reported results. Sure, it was going to barf but
why is interesting. So I can always go back to the low security kernel,
but I'll try for a wheeze to get around that coreutils thing, because it
seems a shame to give up when I am nearly out of the woods.
-- 
        With Best Regards,

        Declan Moriarty.

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to