Thanks. I'll give it a shot tomorrow with a clear head but I don't have high expectations. And to think its so easy to speak and such a b... <lady of the evening> to code ;/
On Oct 2, 2:07 am, Matt Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > On Oct 1, 2010, at 7:48 PM, Scorpio wrote: > > > > > ok I found the exact rules for the rails interpretation of Polish. Now > > I need to implement that. I gotta say its all soooo confusing I > > honestly have no clue where to start > > > one → n is 1; > > few → n mod 10 in 2..4 and n mod 100 not in 12..14; > > other → everything else > > > For anyone who's > > wonderinghttp://unicode.org/repos/cldr-tmp/trunk/diff/supplemental/language_pl... > > > Thanks for all the help guys but I'll be frank I have in my head a > > TODO list on this but I miss any sort of order on that list not to > > mention it feels like reading "To build a car connect the engine to > > the transmission and suspension and enclose all that within a body of > > your choice adding a few minor details along the way" (helpful theory > > but thats how vague the above posts/emails are to me in terms of > > practical application). I know ... I'm dumb... but its kinda hard to > > implement one of the most difficult language on the planet at your > > first go at multi-language ;/ > > Looks like this dev's already done some of it: > > http://dev.netizer.pl/rails-i18n-and-zero-one-two-few-many-other.html > > There's also this link (from the comments on the above post), but I can't > read Polish so I'm just eyeballing the code... > > http://blog.zabiello.com/2010/08/02/pluralization-rails > > --Matt Jones -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en.
