On 11/27/11 13:49 , DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA wrote: > > On 26 Nov 2011, at 03:17 , Russ White wrote: > >> >>> TRILL is not an IP routing protocol. It's a layer 2 bridging >>> protocol more complicated than the spanning tree, and seems >>> completely unnecessary for the small size of bridged networks to >>> be expected in homenets. >> >> What might actually be ideal is something that can route both at >> layer 2 and at layer 3 --I.e., that can treat layer 2 and layer 3 >> within the home identically... > > > We have a saying in Spanish about "killing flies with cannonballs", > and probably what I suggest here will be, but I have been the whole > week reading and discussing about Seamless MPLS, and it sounded > precisely like you said...
Having routing protocols that are in-fact agnostic about what AF they are carrying as in the past proved useful when it was found necessary to carry another one. > > -- "Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno" > > Dr Diego R. Lopez Telefonica I+D > > e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +34 913 129 041 > ----------------------------------------- > > > > > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico > en el enlace situado más abajo. This message is intended exclusively > for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the > terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list > [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet > _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
