On 11/27/11 13:49 , DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA wrote:
> 
> On 26 Nov 2011, at 03:17 , Russ White wrote:
> 
>> 
>>> TRILL is not an IP routing protocol. It's a layer 2 bridging
>>> protocol more complicated than the spanning tree, and seems
>>> completely unnecessary for the small size of bridged networks to
>>> be expected in homenets.
>> 
>> What might actually be ideal is something that can route both at
>> layer 2 and at layer 3 --I.e., that can treat layer 2 and layer 3
>> within the home identically...
> 
> 
> We have a saying in Spanish about "killing flies with cannonballs",
> and probably what I suggest here will be, but I have been the whole
> week reading and discussing about Seamless MPLS, and it sounded
> precisely like you said...

Having routing protocols that are in-fact agnostic about what AF they
are carrying as in the past proved useful when it was found necessary to
carry another one.

> 
> -- "Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno"
> 
> Dr Diego R. Lopez Telefonica I+D
> 
> e-mail: [email protected] Tel:      +34 913 129 041 
> -----------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede
> consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico
> en el enlace situado más abajo. This message is intended exclusively
> for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the
> terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx 
> _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list 
> [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
> 

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to