On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 13:38, Jim Gettys <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Because the primitives that are available to you in IPv4 (essentially, > > NAT and DHCPv4) are different to the primitives available to you in > > IPv6. IPv6 allows you to do stuff like deprecate your default gateway > > and prefix, and to have multiple default gateways. IPv4 does not. So I > > suspect that when you look at things, you're not going to be able to > > route IPv4 reliably. > > > This mail serves as "running code" counter example. CeroWrt routes > IPv4 today, and I've been happy for months. > Sure, it will work in static topologies. It won't work so well when you move stuff around. Bridging, or IPv6 routing, does.
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
