Alex, >>> In my understanding, there is a need to couple the prefix assignment to the >>> routing protocol. Although I am not sure how much tight, or what tight and >>> loose might mean. >> >> to clarify what I meant: >> tight coupling --- integrated in a routing protocol, e.g. in >> draft-arkko-homenet-prefix-assignment >> loosely coupled --- separate (new) protocol > > Could it be separate (existing) protocol?
if one had existed, sure. requirements from homenet-arch (I might have missed some): - must support multi-homing - each link should be assigned a stable prefix - efficient allocation of prefixes - should support both IPv4 and IPv6 cheers, Ole
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
