Le 30/01/2014 13:28, Ole Troan a écrit :
Could it be separate (existing) protocol?
if one had existed, sure.
requirements from homenet-arch (I might have missed some):
- must support multi-homing
- each link should be assigned a stable prefix
- efficient allocation of prefixes
- should support both IPv4 and IPv6
I meant this:
loosely coupled ---- separate (existing DHCPv6-PD) protocol triggering
route updates to the routing protocol.
yes, DHCP PD comes up as a proposed solution quite frequently.
I just don't see how you can make DHCP PD fulfill the requirements.
Well it does support multi-homing (Server allocates things to as many
interfaces as needed), each link can be assigned a stable prefix
(provided it triggers updates to the Routing protocol), the allocation
is efficient (Server maintains dynamic databases, leases) and it
supports both IPv4 ('IPv4 subnet allocation' RFC6656, DHCP transition et
alia), and IPv6.
I miss something?
Alex
cheers,
Ole
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
