Teco, > I can see reasons for having shared sub-layer for routing protocol and prefix > distribution protocol. As example, in MANET we have such already: RFC 5444 > and 5498. If we define a set of TLVs for border router information and prefix > distribution, it can run on whatever routing protocol. Don't forget BGP. > > For Homenet plug&play, I don't suggest to let configure grandma her favorite > IGP ;)
doesn't that mean we have to pick one? cheers, Ole
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
