I think the subtlety here is whether or not homenet recommends doing this by default in one form or another - as Homenets really don't have the luxury of users deciding to do these types of things or not. In that sense, what may look "operational" in a traditional network with traditional operators, becomes part and parcel of what a "Homenet" is or is not.
- Mark (Thumbtyped) On Feb 15, 2014, at 11:23 PM, Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> wrote: > It's probably worth pointing out that this is essentially an ops document, > not a protocol spec. From an ops perspective, it's perfectly reasonable. > I offered Dave the same criticism about ND that Lorenzo did when he asked me > to look at it, and I still think looking in the neighbor table makes more > sense than sending ICMP messages. But fundamentally I think this is a > useful hack, and worth writing an ops document about. I don't know that > homenet needs to be where the doc is published, but that's a separate issue. > > _______________________________________________ > homenet mailing list > homenet@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
