On Feb 15, 2014, at 5:31 PM, Townsley.net <m...@townsley.net> wrote: > I think the subtlety here is whether or not homenet recommends doing this by > default in one form or another - as Homenets really don't have the luxury of > users deciding to do these types of things or not. In that sense, what may > look "operational" in a traditional network with traditional operators, > becomes part and parcel of what a "Homenet" is or is not.
I think what you're talking about is still an ops doc—it's just a document that describes how operations are done automatically. Because I really don't think it's a protocol spec, but I agree with you that it still needs to be written and makes sense as output of homenet. _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
