Keeping just the relevant parts, sorry the attribution has gotten lost: > So, would it be reasonable for devices that are not sure of the time, > to report that fact, and their view of what the time is to the user > for acceptance?
The above proposes an HNCP TLV to communicate a fault from a particular
device.
My impression is that the rest of the thread is about an HNCP TLV that would
contain software versions for each device that participates.
Tim wrote:
> That works for me as it at least gives something to base a commercial
> contract on that has the strength of independent standards. Tim
But, I didn't understand which part he was referring to.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
