Andrew Sullivan <a...@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
>> ways to implement a policy (assuming the policy is known a-priori),
>> and ways
>> in which can we collect information about when the policy is failing
>> so that
>> things can get fixed; perhaps by a local geek, perhaps by a clueful ISP
>> helpdesk, or eventually, perhaps by a smarter HNCP end-point.
> I think this is right, given the goal I think we're aiming for.
This suggests to me that the next step in HOMENET, which I think the naming
architecture could lead, is to provide for (automatic) collection of
statistics for diagnostics purposes.
i.e. Homenet OAM.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
