Stephen Farrell <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> - Does this sound roughly right or off the wall?
It sounds right.
I think that bootstrap of security should become an recharter item in the
future. Some kind of BCP on interactions with MUD, SUIT, etc. IN THE
FUTURE. NOT NOW.
> 2. We have this milestone in our charter:
> "Nov 2018 - Submission of the perimeter security draft
> to the IESG as Informational RFC"
Yes. Are the authors still engaged?
I think I've missed the last three homenet WG sessions due to conflicts.
I find that the ML is too frequently ratholed when it isn't silent.
> - Does the homenet wg need to profile use of those
> security mechanisms, for example to document a way to
> establish initial keying material that we'd like to see
> implemented when those protocols are used in home networks?
> - If so, (and without yet getting into discussions about ToFU
> etc) do we have people who are interested in working on
> that?
Yes, but not yet.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
