Stephen Farrell <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> On 24/01/18 02:48, Michael Richardson wrote:
>>
>> Stephen Farrell <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: > - Does this sound
>> roughly right or off the wall?
>>
>> It sounds right. I think that bootstrap of security should become an
>> recharter item in the future. Some kind of BCP on interactions with
>> MUD, SUIT, etc. IN THE FUTURE. NOT NOW.
> Can you say more? Eg. what would be needed before you think it'd be
> sensible for homenet to start work in this space?
a) finish (really finish) Babel work, that might mean interacting with BABEL
WG
b) DNS naming and delegation in Last Call.
c) ANIMA and related groups publish *managed* enrollment,
so that HOMENET can consider how *unmanaged* enrollment might work.
>> > 2. We have this milestone in our charter:
>>
>> > "Nov 2018 - Submission of the perimeter security draft > to the IESG
>> as Informational RFC"
>>
>> Yes. Are the authors still engaged?
> I'm not aware that we have authors;-( I guess someone could have
> volunteered in the past before I was helping out as chair (if so,
> please do let us know).
Ah, so it was Erik and some other people. I see that the draft has even
expired. I'm thinking about:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kline-homenet-default-perimeter/
Maybe you are thinking about something else?
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
