Hi Michael,
On 05/06/2021 19:46, Michael Richardson wrote:
Well, I'd be happy to discuss with this them again, but they'd have to actually tell us what "DDNS" really is for them.
Just to clarify: I don't think/claim DDNS is "better" than the proposal here, rather I don't find the arguments as to why this is "better" convincing, and so, given that DDNS is deployed, and has some similarity, I'm wondering if this spec really has much of a chance at gaining traction. As a result, I don't really think there's that much value in attempting a point-scoring exercise comparing the two, the question for me is really whether or not this spec is so much better than DDNS that it could displace DDNS, and I'm not convinced as of now. (But I'm often wrong of course.) Cheers, S.
OpenPGP_0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
