Juliusz Chroboczek <j...@irif.fr> wrote: > Michael, it would probably take you 20 minutes to write up an I-D > describing a reasonable REST-based DDNS protocol, another 5 minutes to > write a client implementation in Javascript, and one hour to write > a robust server that is well integrated with Bind.
Yes, I did that. It's in front of you. As you said, there are three different specifications: why didn't you pick one? We went back and forth multiple times as to REST vs AXFR from the HNA. The feedback *FROM DNS OPERATORS* (which you aren't) was that they preferred AXFR. >> If the device renumbers, or experiences a flash renumbering, how does it >> know to re-register? > All of these are interesting issues. However, I don't see how they depend > on whether the update is carried over HTTPS or AXFR. It sure does, because DDNS as described by you is done by the end-device, which can't see the IPv4 renumber, which btw, is all those devices support. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet