Juliusz Chroboczek <j...@irif.fr> wrote:
> Michael, it would probably take you 20 minutes to write up an I-D
> describing a reasonable REST-based DDNS protocol, another 5 minutes to
> write a client implementation in Javascript, and one hour to write
> a robust server that is well integrated with Bind.
Yes, I did that. It's in front of you.
As you said, there are three different specifications: why didn't you pick one?
We went back and forth multiple times as to REST vs AXFR from the HNA.
The feedback *FROM DNS OPERATORS* (which you aren't) was that they preferred
AXFR.
>> If the device renumbers, or experiences a flash renumbering, how does it
>> know to re-register?
> All of these are interesting issues. However, I don't see how they depend
> on whether the update is carried over HTTPS or AXFR.
It sure does, because DDNS as described by you is done by the end-device,
which can't see the IPv4 renumber, which btw, is all those devices support.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
