I don't beleive that it's necessarily taught that because it was an English way of doing it, I think it was more of the difference between classical and ecclesiastical pronunciations.
Chris --- James Symington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There's no debate about how a Roman would have pronounced it: > > pah-chem > > althought that is not the way I was taught it at school. If there was an > excruciatingly English way of doing it, that was the road that was taken - > pah kem in this instance. > > Ciao > > James > _______________________________________________ > post: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > set your options at http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/tedesccj%40yahoo.com __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html _______________________________________________ post: [EMAIL PROTECTED] set your options at http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org
