On Wed, 8 Dec 1999, Gilles Detillieux wrote:
> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 09:42:01 -0600 (CST)
> From: Gilles Detillieux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Joe R. Jah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [htdig3-dev] Re: htdig-3.1.4 prerelease
>
> Is it possible that you were getting the extra .shtml/ stuff, but just
> weren't detecting it in your searches, or are you sure they never came up?
For that particular keyword search I am sure they never came up.
> Where does the word appear in these 19 extra documents? If it's in img
> alt text, or immediately after a bare ampersand (&), that would explain
^^^^^^^^
> why htdig 3.1.3 or earlier failed to index that word in these documents.
> If it appears elsewhere, I'd be very curious to know why htdig 3.1.3
> missed it, and if it doesn't appear anywhere in the document or in
> descriptions of hyperlinks to the documents, I'd like to know why htdig
> 3.1.4 is putting it in the index. Please look into this further, if you
> can, and get back to me ASAP. We'd like to release 3.1.4 tomorrow, but
> not if it's putting incorrect entries in the index.
Bingo;) They were all in img alt text, in that particular search.
> Wow, patches to 3.1.4 before it's even released! :)
Yes, and I'd love to add another one to it, the max_keywords attribute I
requested a month or so ago;)
Regards,
Joe
--
_/ _/_/_/ _/ ____________ __o
_/ _/ _/ _/ ______________ _-\<,_
_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ ......(_)/ (_)
_/_/ oe _/ _/. _/_/ ah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the htdig3-dev mailing list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You will receive a message to confirm this.
