According to Joe R. Jah:
> I have patched 3.1.4 release with your three patches and tested it. For
> five values of max_keywords, 0 6 9 11 13, I randig and searched one
> keyword. I chose a keyword that is the sixth meta keyword in a set of
> over a hundred meta keywords that one department in our site keeps in 16
> documents.
...
> I interpret the above that increasing the value of max_keywords causes an
> increase in the size of db.wordlist; every other increase also causes an
> increase in the size of db.words.db; however, the increase does not
> translate into search results. In other words if max_keywords is set to a
> value other than zero, meta keywords become useless, although, they
> evidently make a difference in the dig;-/
If they make a difference in the dig, why don't they show up in
the search. Does the specific keyword you're looking for in htsearch
actually exist in db.wordlist in all cases? Does its weight change when
you change max_keywords?
Perhaps you should try a simpler test case. Just dig one or two of the
documents with all the keywords, and nothing else. Then, you'll get a
better handle on what changes when you change max_keywords.
The fact that db.wordlist increases in size suggests to me that the
keywords are being added. Maybe what you think is the 6th meta keyword
isn't really the 6th. Remember that meta keyword tags can take many
forms, especially if you've customised the keywords_meta_tag_names
attribute.
--
Gilles R. Detillieux E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Spinal Cord Research Centre WWW: http://www.scrc.umanitoba.ca/~grdetil
Dept. Physiology, U. of Manitoba Phone: (204)789-3766
Winnipeg, MB R3E 3J7 (Canada) Fax: (204)789-3930
------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the htdig3-dev mailing list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You will receive a message to confirm this.
