It finished stitching and the same result. Here it is: http://www.bluelavalamp.net/enblend_comparison_2.jpg
The top and middle are the ones from before (see first message in thread). The last image is the same .pto file as the first, but with the Photometric Optimizations all set to zero, so that's not causing this problem. Have people been able to stitch very wide panoramas before, one that's over 95,000 pixels wide? If they have, then it's gotta be something on my end, maybe I'm using an older library or something. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
