On Sep 26, 9:18 am, "T. Modes" <thomas.mo...@gmx.de> wrote:
> That's simply wrong. The multirow/stack option has also advantages for > "simple" panoramas. It is faster (in most cases) in comparision to > match all images at once, and more important it reduces drastically > the risk of getting wrong connections/control points. If there are no > stacks, this step is simply skipped. > So with multi-row the cp detection is more robust and therefore a > newbie will get better results with it than with an "all in one" > setting. > Just removing it from the installer doesn't mean the user can't use it in the future. It's just a matter of creating a new CPG entry and populating it with the desired calls. I agree that stacks are a good thing, that's why I tried to find a way of keeping the entry by replacing the two-step CPG process involving autopano/generatekeys by something the user might have already (he may or may not have any of the CPGs, since the user can choose which to install). I still feel the initial install is better off lean, but I it's just my personal preference. with regards KFJ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
