On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 07:06:01 -0700 (PDT), JohnPW wrote: > Well that's one of those easy situations. > When you can see the horizon clearly like that, horizontal CPs > distributed about the pano on the horizon should give you great > results. Contrary to how one might casually think, placing them far > apart (with very wide angle images) produces diminishing accuracy. As > they get closer to 180º apart the effect of minor errors in point > placement is amplified, just as it would be by placing them closer to > 0º apart.
One would think it would be simple, but it wasn't. There was one error of about 1 pixel I was never able to get rid of, and I had to play some games in GIMP to clean it up to my satisfaction. Even 1 pixel error is very noticeable for something like the sky-sae interface. > Was this at Long Point Light or were you up on a communications tower? Provincetown Monument. See http://rlk.smugmug.com/Other/Landscapes/4851912_XB4SmT/1079379016_sm6Jy (the monument itself is http://rlk.smugmug.com/Travel/Provincetown-MA-October-2010/14616061_32XQRG/1087222681_A2kfU). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
