Low freq would not encrypt much Dee. The only way it is useful at that
actual transmission rate is in sub. comms where the one way and
[secret ] simple coding is worth sticking with.
A high tech system would/could not use use such a low bandwidth
protocol in a meaningful way it would also be vulnerable to the mass
of LF  pollution we suffer from.
I admit it could be used in shielding technology- but that would not
go on/off endlessly.
That's why I think Hum more likely to be a side effect- if NOT simply
Sub. Comms .

On Jun 20, 1:29 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote:
> Then maybe it stands to reason that what we are hearing is the
> encrypted sound
> of a machine code.   I don't know if others are you aware of this, but
> what is going on in this world is a Global action of manipulation and
> control.
>
>   Possibly the hum is a machine code of a weaponry type system within
> the grids of their satellite constellations.
>
>   Just an opinion.
>
> On May 31, 11:01 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Thanks for the Intro Ed !
>
> > Quote :I would like to know what evidence is there that the hum has no
> > relationship to LFS
>
> > There is a relationship, it masquerades as LFS- about as much as a
> > relationship as a tart with a client!
> > As far as I'm concerned though,  the issue is not completely closed
> > though and, until Hum is nailed.
> > Other physical attributes like Tinnitus, LF/HF  EMF smog and general
> > noise will get dragged in, till then.
> > Many people suffering/posting on Hum have a gut feeling ,from what is
> > said- in the main, that there is something 'unusual ' about it.  ie:
> > Not normal audio !
> > The fact that it resists audio recordings and is hard to synthesize,
> > gets heard underground and has a wayward character in extremis gives
> > it quite a legacy.
> > This without any expansion of the medical side effects of (principly)
> > night time intrusions.
>
> > PS: Confidentiality Notice seems a bit over the top here ;)
>
> > On May 31, 4:08 pm, Ed Sacchette <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Sorry to disappoint, but I have no connection with the UK government. I am
> > > an American who has been researching environmental issues such as this for
> > > some time. I am a licensed private investigator, confidential means
> > > confidential. This public survey tool (surveymonkey) is not a government
> > > plot, as far as I know. Here is a link to my 
> > > background.http://www.linkedin.com/pub/edward-sacchette/b/248/57
> > > I have a question, I would like to know what evidence is there that the 
> > > hum
> > > has no relationship to LFS?
>
> > > --
> > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE - This e-mail transmission and any documents, files
> > > or previous e-mail messages attached to it, may contain information that 
> > > is
> > > confidential or legally privileged.  If you are not the intended 
> > > recipient,
> > > or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you 
> > > are
> > > hereby notified that you must not read or print this transmission and that
> > > any disclosure, copying, printing, distribution or use of any of the
> > > information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY
> > > PROHIBITED.  If you have received this transmission in error, please
> > > immediately notify the sender by telephone or return e-mail and delete the
> > > original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any
> > > manner.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum 
Sufferers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to