I think, under the current 'scheme of things' , that comparisons in hum level don't help because the big question isn't whether it affects some people more or less, but why it is in evidence at all. It may be helpful for us to report levels to JD , but only against a yardstick, which we don't have currently. I'm just being honest. A scale of 0-100% is meaningless without a datum.. I appreciate your thoughts about a B52,but as there many of these Haarp type setups around the world it would be rather a long job and you wouldn't get near the first contact placing with whoever took the option up-as you well know.
I think the main usefulness of sites like this is to give some commonality to the problem ,as we do together ,and show the PTB that we are aware and angry about the whole business and simply are not going to stop looking for clues and slip-ups in execution of whatever's behind the Hum,CT's,Globalism and a few other questionable modern activities which may , or may not be related. On that there is no 'in-between' for me! On Jul 29, 4:26 pm, Pete <[email protected]> wrote: > ********Pete, being ON ,OFF or somewhere in between doesn't get us > very far, > scalar or not! *********** > > It's a good start, especially for those who think it's in their heads, > or who think they're going mad and think that synthetic pharms will be > the cure. To be told it's external and they are one of millions > worldwide who "hear" this thing is comforting to say the least, > especially as there are those who have an agenda to persuade us that > it's tinnitus. Besides, what can we do? All we can do is conjecture > and lobby at the risk of being labelled mad or time wasters. Failing > that we can all club together and hire a B52 with the requisite bombs > and take out each and every HAARP or similar installations one by one > and see if that stops it. Well of course we can't, all we can do is > theorise about what The Hum is and what it's for. Trouble is all this > conjecturing clouds the issue so in the end we can't see the wood for > the trees. The cause of the Hum is explainable, what it's actually for > is debatable, who's behind it is a mystery...........but I've got a > damned good idea about the last two. > > On, off or somewhere in-between. Well according to The Hum Forum, it's > very much 'off ' all over at present, though some are reporting > problems........ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
