Sorry Trev but the ability to think in pictures (images) as well as the human brains ability to think in math points to that we are not just analogue but digital as well. Analog/Analogue - implies a continuous signal in contrast with digital, which breaks everything into numbers.
The link tells us only what they want us to know or be aware of. Are you all of a sudden forgetting the media is a controlled forum? Blut sometimes they give us a piece of the truth. And why would you imply THE ARTICLE DEMANDED THE USE OF A SPECIAL BLACK BOX? The reality is they told us what their first step was of the pathways they were using of experimental testing to find their way to 'ARTIFICALLY FIRING NEURONS". More recently, Dr. Isacoff, with Dirk Trauner, a chemistry professor at the University of California, Berkeley, and other colleagues engineered a high-speed neural switch by refurbishing a channel protein that anchors in the cell membrane of most human brain cells. channelrhodopsin-2 from green algae Neuroscientists realized that this pond scum protein might be used to hot-wire a neuron with light. Did you even read the 2nd page of the article? Did you miss the part where they recorded the neuron activity by using sensor molecules that lit up as well? They simultaneously monitored for responses in connecting neurons, by recording from an electrode or using sensor molecules that light up. Scientists have long known that using electrodes to gently zap one side of a mouse’s motor cortex will make it turn the opposite way. What is new here is that for the first time, researchers can perturb specific neuron types using light, Dr. Deisseroth said Neuroscientists have long sought a better alternative than electrode stimulation. In the past few years, some have jury-rigged ways TO EXCITE THE BRAIN BY USING LIGHT http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/14/science/14brai.html?pagewanted=2 pg 2 More recently, Dr. Isacoff, with Dirk Trauner, a chemistry professor at the University of California, Berkeley, and other colleagues engineered a high-speed neural switch by refurbishing a channel protein that anchors in the cell membrane of most human brain cells. The scientists tethered to the protein a light-sensitive synthetic molecular string that has glutamate, a neurotransmitter, dangling off the end. Upon absorbing violet light, the string plugs the glutamate into the protein’s receptor and sparks a neuron’s natural activation process: the channel opens, positive ions flood inside, and the cell unleashes an electrical impulse. In experiments published in May in the journal Neuron, the Berkeley team bred zebrafish that carried the artificial glutamate switch within neurons that help sense touch. “If I were a fish, and somebody poked me in the side,” (in this case, with a fine glass tip), Dr. Isacoff said, “I would escape.” But when the translucent fish were strobed with violet light, the overstimulated creatures no longer detected being prodded. Blue-green light reversed the effect. In 2003, Georg Nagel, a biophysicist then at the Max Planck Institute of Biophysics in Frankfurt, and colleagues characterized channelrhodopsin-2 from green algae. This channel protein lets positive ions stream into cells when exposed to blue light. It functioned even when inserted into human kidney cells, the researchers showed. Neuroscientists realized that this pond scum protein might be used to hot-wire a neuron with light. In 2005, Edward Boyden, then a graduate student at Stanford, Mr. Zhang and Dr. Deisseroth, joining with the German researchers, demonstrated that the idea worked. And in separate research published last spring, Mr. Zhang and Dr. Boyden, now at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, each found a way to also silence neurons: a bacterial protein called halorhodopsin, when placed in a brain cell, can cause the cell to shut down in response to yellow light. The Stanford-Germany team put both the “on” and “off” toggles into the motor neurons or muscle cells of transgenic roundworms. Blue light made the creatures contract their muscles and pull back; yellow let them relax their muscles and inch forward. Dr. Augustine and associates at Duke next collaborated with Dr. Deisseroth to create transgenic mice with channelrhodopsin in different brain cell populations. By quickly scanning with a blue laser across brain tissue, they stimulated cells containing the switch. They simultaneously monitored for responses in connecting neurons, by recording from an electrode or using sensor molecules that light up. So in reality, their was no freaked out on my part because in reality their was NO PLANTED BLACK BOX SPECIAL CELL. The reality was their was manipulation of proteins. No freaking out here Trev. The reality is they can put those proteins in our food, or even in those thousands of chemtrails they have been spewing around the world. None of us would be the wiser. The smoking gun is their for those willing to look outside the box. Such research benefits could extend beyond the realm of neuroscience: The Stanford group has sent DNA copies of the “on” and “off” light- switch genes to more than 175 researchers eager to try them in all stripes of electrically excitable cells, from insulin-releasing pancreas cells to heart cells. Peace On Jul 28, 3:07 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > Just because there's a lot of digital 'mush' around us, it doesn't > make humans dgital ! We're analogue. > Also, just because there's a lot of rightful suspicions about the aims > and means of modern techno Gov'ts- doesn't actually make them proven > guilty. > Without a 'smoking gun' your views can only be supposition, Dee! > > Your linked article demands the use of a planted 'back box' special > cell as a receiver to work the trick -nd is a long way from proof of > concept for mind control. > Be aware , but not freaked is my suggestion. > > On Jul 27, 10:57 pm, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Trev Yes our brains are a form of a machine. Why would you infer > > HUMANS DON'T HAVE MACHINE CODE. What the heck do you consider > > language, grammer, visual, audio sensory pathways to be receiving of > > information being > > sent to our brains? All that sensory awareness is signals being > > received by our > > brains via chemical and electrical impulses. Optical and sound have > > the capacity > > to speak our brains machine codes of languages. > > >http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/14/science/14brai.html? > > > The other point is you keep mentioning 'Machine Code' as a factor , > > but humans don't have one- as we're not machines. > > > Yes Trev our brains do have a machine code because we are a form of > > a living machine. We are a form of a machine and that is the basic > > truth. > > It takes a lot of work to run the machine of our bodies. > > Our brains are capable of learning or being conditioned by the use of > > multiple functions as well as interfacing with multiple structures, > > for example audio freqs or the visual of pulses of light. > > > Yes Trev we are a form of a machine. Just because you don't > > understand > > that concept, well it doesn't lessen it as a the truth that all of us > > should have > > awareness of as a reality of truth. BECAUSE SCIENCE > > AND TECHNOLOGY UNDERSTOOD THIS BASIC REALITY MANY YEARS > > AGO, AND AS SUCH THEY USE IT TO THEIR ADVANTAGE AGAINST US. > > > Peace > > > On Jul 25, 8:48 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > The banning, as far as I know , is to do with ELF/Infrasound uses in > > > crowd control. > > > I'll wager this covers audio freqs. though typically lower in > > > practice. > > > I think some trials were down early on in real life and the results > > > were pretty disasterous. > > > Some claim microwaves were blasted at the peace camps when Cruise was > > > set up- wouldn't surprise me- but it wopuldn't happen now people are > > > more clued up. > > > I don't think the Gov't of any hue can be trusted either in what they > > > will do, or cover up ,in the National Interest. [Nice one ,that]. > > > I'm not going to research every comment- but the microwave pulses > > > that are about get by this broad agreement on a technicality in that > > > they are a by product of channel switching in something like Tetra in > > > the UK, or GWEN in the US. > > > There is no proof that anyone is beaming voice to skull in the general > > > population nor is hum seen as such by most. The carrier wave would be > > > easily detectable by anyone with a broadband detector. > > > OK, HAARP is in place and long been, with other transmission of > > > similar vein, suspects for hum effects- but ,though they are at u-wave > > > Tx, the effect on us is secondary, as I read it , by ELF oscillations > > > in the earths magnetosphere. This neglects weather effects, but that > > > is not what we're looking at here directly. > > > The other point is you keep mentioning 'Machine Code' as a factor , > > > but humans don't have one- as we're not machines. > > > The code you are looking for hasn't be shown to me yet! Communicator > > > is still Off! > > > Therefore, without claiming to be expert on any factors- it seems to > > > me that ELF hum is actually, well... ELF ! -and some here would say > > > it's not even Electromagnetic in nature. > > > > On Jul 23, 8:51 pm, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Patty What does dboots put to us mean? > > > > I think we are getting a whole lot put to us. I think they have > > > > been using the > > > > population as guinea pigs for quite a long time. The Hum we hear is > > > > probably > > > > because we are EM sensitive to its sound. > > > > > On Jul 22, 1:43 pm, patty <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I was very surprised to find out that they already knew of the effects > > > > > of this technology and went ahead with it anyway. I think we are > > > > > getting dboots put to us. > > > > > > On Jul 22, 2:08 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Microwave hearing is a phenomenon,decribed by human observers as the > > > > > > sensations of buzzing,ticking,hissing,or knocking sounds that > > > > > > orginate > > > > > > within or immediately behind the head. There is no sound > > > > > > propagating > > > > > > through the air like normal sound This technology in its crudest > > > > > > form > > > > > > could be used to distract individuals,refined it could be used to > > > > > > communicate with hostages or hostages takers directly BY MORSE CODE > > > > > > or > > > > > > other message systems, possibly even by voice communication. > > > > > > > A 1998 US Dept of the Army unclassified document. It became > > > > > > unclassified in 2006. Document is an ADDENDUM to the Nonlethal > > > > > > Technologies-Worldwide study (NGIC-1147-101-98) > > > > > > >http://www.slavery.org.uk/Bioeffects_of_Selected_Non-Lethal_Weapons.pdf > > > > > > > THERMOELASTIC EXPANSION STUDY OF OUR COCHLEAR MECHANISM OF HEARING > > > > > > AND > > > > > > MICROWAVE HEARING OF RF PULSED FIELDS > > > > > > technology goes back over 30 years > > > > > > > On Jul 20, 1:12 pm, patty <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Oh yeah another clue to capturing the hum sound ( I was checking > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > the new ICNIRP 2009 paper just released on their web site) Under > > > > > > > amplitude modulation and microwave auditory effect, around pages > > > > > > > 51 > > > > > > > and 52 they stated: a single microwave pulse can be percieved as > > > > > > > an > > > > > > > acoustic clicking or knocking sound and a train of microwave > > > > > > > pulse to > > > > > > > the head can be sensed as a buzz or audible tune with a pitch > > > > > > > corresponding to the pulse repetition rate....The threshold > > > > > > > pressure > > > > > > > is mPa for perception of sound at the cochlea by humans. > > > > > > > > On Jul 19, 3:23 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Perhaps it's intertwined with some form of a sonic device > > > > > > > > along the > > > > > > > > likes of akin to infrasound generators. Vibrational sound is > > > > > > > > very > > > > > > > > hard to pin down. Maybe we need something like an infrasound > > > > > > > > detector? Or an electrolytic process device? > > > > > > > > I think John was on to something with what he was trying > > > > > > > > before > > > > > > > > that had > > > > > > > > to do with trying to capture/record it with it's underlying > > > > > > > > vibrational effects > > > > > > > > that it is also emitting. > > > > > > > > > On Jul 16, 10:18 am, patty <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Yep, That's why it hasn't been pinned down yet. Sure is a > > > > > > > > > good way to > > > > > > > > > keep us busy though, why we hopfully go quietly crazy. My > > > > > > > > > hum has > > > > > > > > > progressively changed, the new 4G is a real nuisance, > > > > > > > > > physical side > > > > > > > > > effects are like tripled. > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 15, 3:09 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Do you mean that with a constant hum excitation ,of any > > > > > > > > > > means, that > > > > > > > > > > individuals will always hear a 'personal tone' , designated > > > > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > > physical characteristics of the hearer, and this is a > > > > > > > > > > downplay on a > > > > > > > > > > specific 'common' hum type ever being highlighted? > > > > > > > > > > My hum is always the same tone , but the period and sub > > > > > > > > > > modulations > > > > > > > > > > may vary , along with the level. > > > > > > > > > > I think this approach would tally with what I've > > > > > > > > > > experienced. > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 15, 7:47 pm, patty > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Just wondering whether these factors have been considered > > > > > > > > > > > in recording > > > > > > > > > > > the hum. Because the microwaves are entering thru the > > > > > > > > > > > skull. Each > > > > > > > > > > > person has a different configuration when it comes to the > > > > > > > > > > > size of > > > > > > > > > > > their head. I also just read Henry Lai's research on the > > > > > > > > > > > neurological > > > > > > > > > > > effects of nonioninzing radiation, University of > > > > > > > > > > > Washington. He > > > > > > > > > > > stated that they used a hydrophone immersed in a solution > > > > > > > > > > > (0.15 N Kc1) > > > > > > > > > > > having an electrical conductivity similar to that of > > > > > > > > > > > tissue. At least > > > > > > > > > > > this criteria has to be meet. Not to mention all the > > > > > > > > > > > other physical > > > > > > > > > > > differences, cochlear amplification, density of hair cell > > > > > > > > > > > bundles and > > > > > > > > > > > the reaction time to shear force of stimulation not > > > > > > > > > > > originating at the > > > > > > > > > > > outer ear. > > > > > > > > > > > Of course we are all going to have a different > > > > > > > > > > > perception, life is > > > > > > > > > > > great that way.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
