Patty Here's a newer version of neurotransmitters they are studing. NIH Mar 19, 2009 entitled : Adenoviral vectors for highly selective gene expression in central serotonergic neurons reveal quantal characteristics of serotonin release in the rat brain.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19298646?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_Discovery_PMC&linkpos=3&log$=citedinpmcarticles&logdbfrom=pubmed Concerning your earlier comment of The hum has gotten really aggravating here, it vibrates and innerviates my facial nerve from the right side of my head where I hear it at, then pins and needles all the way over to the right side of my face. Could they be using this noise we endear to illuminate or fluorescence that vibration. I also feel the pins and needles to where it numbs the right side of my skull on too numerous of occasions. On Jul 28, 8:08 am, patty <[email protected]> wrote: > For some reason: to refer to humans as mechanic, analogue, or digital > seems to get something inside of me really roused. From my point of > view humans are so much more. The fore mentioned concepts are mere > mimicks. > On board with the boots, I've noticed alot of that in my life, all > around. > I went to a high school that had alot of officers kids and alot of > republicans, the things that they we already were repeating at a young > age, I suppose views they had heard their parents say. It was pretty > wild, the view they had on outsiders. > Personnaly I am resisting conspriracy, I think that will lead > nowhere. It already is such a wild concept that they have persisted > with this tech. even though people complained and sufferered. > I'm having a problem, understanding why we have to prove it to > science, it's just so wrong. > It's almost been five years that I have been listening to these waves > increase, they correlate to the news, I can feel and hear when > something is going on in the news, that's how I convinced my husband > that I was hearing something, we'd turn on the tv and he'd see the > report BREAKING NEWS. > > Just wondering if any of you know of prescribtion meds that help > alleviate these side effects? Safely that is, because the > neurotransmitters are already being stimulated it seems pretty scary > to me. > > Thanks I had to get that off my chest, it's a very difficult spot > we've been put in. > > On Jul 28, 6:07 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Just because there's a lot of digital 'mush' around us, it doesn't > > make humans dgital ! We're analogue. > > Also, just because there's a lot of rightful suspicions about the aims > > and means of modern techno Gov'ts- doesn't actually make them proven > > guilty. > > Without a 'smoking gun' your views can only be supposition, Dee! > > > Your linked article demands the use of a planted 'back box' special > > cell as a receiver to work the trick -nd is a long way from proof of > > concept for mind control. > > Be aware , but not freaked is my suggestion. > > > On Jul 27, 10:57 pm, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Trev Yes our brains are a form of a machine. Why would you infer > > > HUMANS DON'T HAVE MACHINE CODE. What the heck do you consider > > > language, grammer, visual, audio sensory pathways to be receiving of > > > information being > > > sent to our brains? All that sensory awareness is signals being > > > received by our > > > brains via chemical and electrical impulses. Optical and sound have > > > the capacity > > > to speak our brains machine codes of languages. > > > >http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/14/science/14brai.html? > > > > The other point is you keep mentioning 'Machine Code' as a factor , > > > but humans don't have one- as we're not machines. > > > > Yes Trev our brains do have a machine code because we are a form of > > > a living machine. We are a form of a machine and that is the basic > > > truth. > > > It takes a lot of work to run the machine of our bodies. > > > Our brains are capable of learning or being conditioned by the use of > > > multiple functions as well as interfacing with multiple structures, > > > for example audio freqs or the visual of pulses of light. > > > > Yes Trev we are a form of a machine. Just because you don't > > > understand > > > that concept, well it doesn't lessen it as a the truth that all of us > > > should have > > > awareness of as a reality of truth. BECAUSE SCIENCE > > > AND TECHNOLOGY UNDERSTOOD THIS BASIC REALITY MANY YEARS > > > AGO, AND AS SUCH THEY USE IT TO THEIR ADVANTAGE AGAINST US. > > > > Peace > > > > On Jul 25, 8:48 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > The banning, as far as I know , is to do with ELF/Infrasound uses in > > > > crowd control. > > > > I'll wager this covers audio freqs. though typically lower in > > > > practice. > > > > I think some trials were down early on in real life and the results > > > > were pretty disasterous. > > > > Some claim microwaves were blasted at the peace camps when Cruise was > > > > set up- wouldn't surprise me- but it wopuldn't happen now people are > > > > more clued up. > > > > I don't think the Gov't of any hue can be trusted either in what they > > > > will do, or cover up ,in the National Interest. [Nice one ,that]. > > > > I'm not going to research every comment- but the microwave pulses > > > > that are about get by this broad agreement on a technicality in that > > > > they are a by product of channel switching in something like Tetra in > > > > the UK, or GWEN in the US. > > > > There is no proof that anyone is beaming voice to skull in the general > > > > population nor is hum seen as such by most. The carrier wave would be > > > > easily detectable by anyone with a broadband detector. > > > > OK, HAARP is in place and long been, with other transmission of > > > > similar vein, suspects for hum effects- but ,though they are at u-wave > > > > Tx, the effect on us is secondary, as I read it , by ELF oscillations > > > > in the earths magnetosphere. This neglects weather effects, but that > > > > is not what we're looking at here directly. > > > > The other point is you keep mentioning 'Machine Code' as a factor , > > > > but humans don't have one- as we're not machines. > > > > The code you are looking for hasn't be shown to me yet! Communicator > > > > is still Off! > > > > Therefore, without claiming to be expert on any factors- it seems to > > > > me that ELF hum is actually, well... ELF ! -and some here would say > > > > it's not even Electromagnetic in nature. > > > > > On Jul 23, 8:51 pm, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Patty What does dboots put to us mean? > > > > > I think we are getting a whole lot put to us. I think they have > > > > > been using the > > > > > population as guinea pigs for quite a long time. The Hum we hear is > > > > > probably > > > > > because we are EM sensitive to its sound. > > > > > > On Jul 22, 1:43 pm, patty <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > I was very surprised to find out that they already knew of the > > > > > > effects > > > > > > of this technology and went ahead with it anyway. I think we are > > > > > > getting dboots put to us. > > > > > > > On Jul 22, 2:08 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Microwave hearing is a phenomenon,decribed by human observers as > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > sensations of buzzing,ticking,hissing,or knocking sounds that > > > > > > > orginate > > > > > > > within or immediately behind the head. There is no sound > > > > > > > propagating > > > > > > > through the air like normal sound This technology in its crudest > > > > > > > form > > > > > > > could be used to distract individuals,refined it could be used to > > > > > > > communicate with hostages or hostages takers directly BY MORSE > > > > > > > CODE > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > other message systems, possibly even by voice communication. > > > > > > > > A 1998 US Dept of the Army unclassified document. It became > > > > > > > unclassified in 2006. Document is an ADDENDUM to the Nonlethal > > > > > > > Technologies-Worldwide study (NGIC-1147-101-98) > > > > > > > >http://www.slavery.org.uk/Bioeffects_of_Selected_Non-Lethal_Weapons.pdf > > > > > > > > THERMOELASTIC EXPANSION STUDY OF OUR COCHLEAR MECHANISM OF HEARING > > > > > > > AND > > > > > > > MICROWAVE HEARING OF RF PULSED FIELDS > > > > > > > technology goes back over 30 years > > > > > > > > On Jul 20, 1:12 pm, patty <[email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Oh yeah another clue to capturing the hum sound ( I was > > > > > > > > checking on > > > > > > > > the new ICNIRP 2009 paper just released on their web site) > > > > > > > > Under > > > > > > > > amplitude modulation and microwave auditory effect, around > > > > > > > > pages 51 > > > > > > > > and 52 they stated: a single microwave pulse can be percieved > > > > > > > > as an > > > > > > > > acoustic clicking or knocking sound and a train of microwave > > > > > > > > pulse to > > > > > > > > the head can be sensed as a buzz or audible tune with a pitch > > > > > > > > corresponding to the pulse repetition rate....The threshold > > > > > > > > pressure > > > > > > > > is mPa for perception of sound at the cochlea by humans. > > > > > > > > > On Jul 19, 3:23 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps it's intertwined with some form of a sonic device > > > > > > > > > along the > > > > > > > > > likes of akin to infrasound generators. Vibrational sound is > > > > > > > > > very > > > > > > > > > hard to pin down. Maybe we need something like an infrasound > > > > > > > > > detector? Or an electrolytic process device? > > > > > > > > > I think John was on to something with what he was trying > > > > > > > > > before > > > > > > > > > that had > > > > > > > > > to do with trying to capture/record it with it's underlying > > > > > > > > > vibrational effects > > > > > > > > > that it is also emitting. > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 16, 10:18 am, patty > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Yep, That's why it hasn't been pinned down yet. Sure is a > > > > > > > > > > good way to > > > > > > > > > > keep us busy though, why we hopfully go quietly crazy. My > > > > > > > > > > hum has > > > > > > > > > > progressively changed, the new 4G is a real nuisance, > > > > > > > > > > physical side > > > > > > > > > > effects are like tripled. > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 15, 3:09 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you mean that with a constant hum excitation ,of any > > > > > > > > > > > means, that > > > > > > > > > > > individuals will always hear a 'personal tone' , > > > > > > > > > > > designated by > > > > > > > > > > > physical characteristics of the hearer, and this is a > > > > > > > > > > > downplay on a > > > > > > > > > > > specific 'common' hum type ever being highlighted? > > > > > > > > > > > My hum is always the same tone , but the period and sub > > > > > > > > > > > modulations > > > > > > > > > > > may vary , along with the level. > > > > > > > > > > > I think this approach would tally with what I've > > > > > > > > > > > experienced. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 15, 7:47 pm, patty > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just wondering whether > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
