Just because there's a lot of digital 'mush' around us, it doesn't make humans dgital ! We're analogue. Also, just because there's a lot of rightful suspicions about the aims and means of modern techno Gov'ts- doesn't actually make them proven guilty. Without a 'smoking gun' your views can only be supposition, Dee!
Your linked article demands the use of a planted 'back box' special cell as a receiver to work the trick -nd is a long way from proof of concept for mind control. Be aware , but not freaked is my suggestion. On Jul 27, 10:57 pm, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > Trev Yes our brains are a form of a machine. Why would you infer > HUMANS DON'T HAVE MACHINE CODE. What the heck do you consider > language, grammer, visual, audio sensory pathways to be receiving of > information being > sent to our brains? All that sensory awareness is signals being > received by our > brains via chemical and electrical impulses. Optical and sound have > the capacity > to speak our brains machine codes of languages. > > http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/14/science/14brai.html? > > The other point is you keep mentioning 'Machine Code' as a factor , > but humans don't have one- as we're not machines. > > Yes Trev our brains do have a machine code because we are a form of > a living machine. We are a form of a machine and that is the basic > truth. > It takes a lot of work to run the machine of our bodies. > Our brains are capable of learning or being conditioned by the use of > multiple functions as well as interfacing with multiple structures, > for example audio freqs or the visual of pulses of light. > > Yes Trev we are a form of a machine. Just because you don't > understand > that concept, well it doesn't lessen it as a the truth that all of us > should have > awareness of as a reality of truth. BECAUSE SCIENCE > AND TECHNOLOGY UNDERSTOOD THIS BASIC REALITY MANY YEARS > AGO, AND AS SUCH THEY USE IT TO THEIR ADVANTAGE AGAINST US. > > Peace > > On Jul 25, 8:48 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > The banning, as far as I know , is to do with ELF/Infrasound uses in > > crowd control. > > I'll wager this covers audio freqs. though typically lower in > > practice. > > I think some trials were down early on in real life and the results > > were pretty disasterous. > > Some claim microwaves were blasted at the peace camps when Cruise was > > set up- wouldn't surprise me- but it wopuldn't happen now people are > > more clued up. > > I don't think the Gov't of any hue can be trusted either in what they > > will do, or cover up ,in the National Interest. [Nice one ,that]. > > I'm not going to research every comment- but the microwave pulses > > that are about get by this broad agreement on a technicality in that > > they are a by product of channel switching in something like Tetra in > > the UK, or GWEN in the US. > > There is no proof that anyone is beaming voice to skull in the general > > population nor is hum seen as such by most. The carrier wave would be > > easily detectable by anyone with a broadband detector. > > OK, HAARP is in place and long been, with other transmission of > > similar vein, suspects for hum effects- but ,though they are at u-wave > > Tx, the effect on us is secondary, as I read it , by ELF oscillations > > in the earths magnetosphere. This neglects weather effects, but that > > is not what we're looking at here directly. > > The other point is you keep mentioning 'Machine Code' as a factor , > > but humans don't have one- as we're not machines. > > The code you are looking for hasn't be shown to me yet! Communicator > > is still Off! > > Therefore, without claiming to be expert on any factors- it seems to > > me that ELF hum is actually, well... ELF ! -and some here would say > > it's not even Electromagnetic in nature. > > > On Jul 23, 8:51 pm, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Patty What does dboots put to us mean? > > > I think we are getting a whole lot put to us. I think they have > > > been using the > > > population as guinea pigs for quite a long time. The Hum we hear is > > > probably > > > because we are EM sensitive to its sound. > > > > On Jul 22, 1:43 pm, patty <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I was very surprised to find out that they already knew of the effects > > > > of this technology and went ahead with it anyway. I think we are > > > > getting dboots put to us. > > > > > On Jul 22, 2:08 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Microwave hearing is a phenomenon,decribed by human observers as the > > > > > sensations of buzzing,ticking,hissing,or knocking sounds that > > > > > orginate > > > > > within or immediately behind the head. There is no sound > > > > > propagating > > > > > through the air like normal sound This technology in its crudest form > > > > > could be used to distract individuals,refined it could be used to > > > > > communicate with hostages or hostages takers directly BY MORSE CODE > > > > > or > > > > > other message systems, possibly even by voice communication. > > > > > > A 1998 US Dept of the Army unclassified document. It became > > > > > unclassified in 2006. Document is an ADDENDUM to the Nonlethal > > > > > Technologies-Worldwide study (NGIC-1147-101-98) > > > > > >http://www.slavery.org.uk/Bioeffects_of_Selected_Non-Lethal_Weapons.pdf > > > > > > THERMOELASTIC EXPANSION STUDY OF OUR COCHLEAR MECHANISM OF HEARING > > > > > AND > > > > > MICROWAVE HEARING OF RF PULSED FIELDS > > > > > technology goes back over 30 years > > > > > > On Jul 20, 1:12 pm, patty <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Oh yeah another clue to capturing the hum sound ( I was checking on > > > > > > the new ICNIRP 2009 paper just released on their web site) Under > > > > > > amplitude modulation and microwave auditory effect, around pages 51 > > > > > > and 52 they stated: a single microwave pulse can be percieved as an > > > > > > acoustic clicking or knocking sound and a train of microwave pulse > > > > > > to > > > > > > the head can be sensed as a buzz or audible tune with a pitch > > > > > > corresponding to the pulse repetition rate....The threshold pressure > > > > > > is mPa for perception of sound at the cochlea by humans. > > > > > > > On Jul 19, 3:23 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Perhaps it's intertwined with some form of a sonic device along > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > likes of akin to infrasound generators. Vibrational sound is very > > > > > > > hard to pin down. Maybe we need something like an infrasound > > > > > > > detector? Or an electrolytic process device? > > > > > > > I think John was on to something with what he was trying > > > > > > > before > > > > > > > that had > > > > > > > to do with trying to capture/record it with it's underlying > > > > > > > vibrational effects > > > > > > > that it is also emitting. > > > > > > > > On Jul 16, 10:18 am, patty <[email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Yep, That's why it hasn't been pinned down yet. Sure is a good > > > > > > > > way to > > > > > > > > keep us busy though, why we hopfully go quietly crazy. My hum > > > > > > > > has > > > > > > > > progressively changed, the new 4G is a real nuisance, physical > > > > > > > > side > > > > > > > > effects are like tripled. > > > > > > > > > On Jul 15, 3:09 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Do you mean that with a constant hum excitation ,of any > > > > > > > > > means, that > > > > > > > > > individuals will always hear a 'personal tone' , designated by > > > > > > > > > physical characteristics of the hearer, and this is a > > > > > > > > > downplay on a > > > > > > > > > specific 'common' hum type ever being highlighted? > > > > > > > > > My hum is always the same tone , but the period and sub > > > > > > > > > modulations > > > > > > > > > may vary , along with the level. > > > > > > > > > I think this approach would tally with what I've experienced. > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 15, 7:47 pm, patty <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Just wondering whether these factors have been considered > > > > > > > > > > in recording > > > > > > > > > > the hum. Because the microwaves are entering thru the > > > > > > > > > > skull. Each > > > > > > > > > > person has a different configuration when it comes to the > > > > > > > > > > size of > > > > > > > > > > their head. I also just read Henry Lai's research on the > > > > > > > > > > neurological > > > > > > > > > > effects of nonioninzing radiation, University of > > > > > > > > > > Washington. He > > > > > > > > > > stated that they used a hydrophone immersed in a solution > > > > > > > > > > (0.15 N Kc1) > > > > > > > > > > having an electrical conductivity similar to that of > > > > > > > > > > tissue. At least > > > > > > > > > > this criteria has to be meet. Not to mention all the other > > > > > > > > > > physical > > > > > > > > > > differences, cochlear amplification, density of hair cell > > > > > > > > > > bundles and > > > > > > > > > > the reaction time to shear force of stimulation not > > > > > > > > > > originating at the > > > > > > > > > > outer ear. > > > > > > > > > > Of course we are all going to have a different perception, > > > > > > > > > > life is > > > > > > > > > > great that way.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
