Trev  You don't think that sound manipulation is a application of
something?
You don't think this Hum we are forced to endure is some form of an
applicaton of something?  You don't have a concept that this hum we
endure is a
form of some application of sound made to affect us in some capacity
or to affect our unique frequencies in some regard?

On Sep 19, 3:09 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote:
> Just because nature produces  low voltages naturally, doesn't make
> nanobot Reapers/Raptors a foregone conclusion Dee!
> The technology can be abused but the whole idea of nano work is its
> smallness in molecular biology etc.
> Yes, it can be misapplied like everything else- but that doesn't make
> it all powerful-an application is needed for example first. What are
> you proposing?
> The amount of expenditure envisaged in making 'creaking cricket' trees
> seems unduly high to me!
> I'll have to assume you're a tad technophobic -and I can't counteract
> all your worries on here.
> All the same -it's an interesting area and one to follow up.
> One area is the effect on nature of high voltage power lines where
> the  encroaching trees are a continual problem -and there is the broad
> question of  man-made/solar EM effects on nature as a whole.
>
> On Sep 18, 8:12 pm, dboots <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > You are also leaving out of your equations the advancement of the nano
> > technologys  Something like this would be perfect in which to power a
> > nano
> > device since they run on such lower level voltage energys.
>
> > On Sep 17, 7:56 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Far from writing the subject off - I actually made measurements to
> > > verify.
> > > I've a pic of the meter showing level and includes the tree leaf which
> > > i would like identifying.
> > > Probably an Acer- I will post later.
> > > That power source capacity was/remains very low- though further work
> > > is possible;
> > > In matters like this, being lay or not doesn't make much difference-
> > > In fact, remaining objective is part of the job of sensible
> > > investigating.
>
> > > On Sep 18, 2:35 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > >   Sorry Trec that fake cricket sound was no tree creaking  I am 50 yrs
> > > > old n I
> > > > have heard my share of trees creak.  Even the high school students
> > > > knew the
> > > > sound was a fake of somekind who just happened to be passing by.  The
> > > > recording repeated itself by stopping and starting numerous times
>
> > > >   Sorry Trev but I am not going to write this one off just because at
> > > > first glance
> > > > you see no revelance cause from my point of view their is quite a
> > > > major
> > > > factor of relevance
>
> > > > On Sep 17, 7:38 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote:- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum 
Sufferers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to