Dee Quote: You don't think that sound manipulation is a application of something? Er, Yes! But what are you referencing? This is as a good an overview as I've seem and I support the 'many sources' idea. http://www.btinternet.com/~gmbarnes/HUM.htm (We fear less what we understand) Posted by 'coatesmatgaret' on the Yahoo site.
I have added the pic of tree voltage measurement to files here. tree vtest.jpg I reiterate- this is very low power capability. If anyone can specify the tree from the bark or leaf- that would be helpful. On Sep 21, 3:02 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > Trev You don't think that sound manipulation is a application of > something? > You don't think this Hum we are forced to endure is some form of an > applicaton of something? You don't have a concept that this hum we > endure is a > form of some application of sound made to affect us in some capacity > or to affect our unique frequencies in some regard? > > On Sep 19, 3:09 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Just because nature produces low voltages naturally, doesn't make > > nanobot Reapers/Raptors a foregone conclusion Dee! > > The technology can be abused but the whole idea of nano work is its > > smallness in molecular biology etc. > > Yes, it can be misapplied like everything else- but that doesn't make > > it all powerful-an application is needed for example first. What are > > you proposing? > > The amount of expenditure envisaged in making 'creaking cricket' trees > > seems unduly high to me! > > I'll have to assume you're a tad technophobic -and I can't counteract > > all your worries on here. > > All the same -it's an interesting area and one to follow up. > > One area is the effect on nature of high voltage power lines where > > the encroaching trees are a continual problem -and there is the broad > > question of man-made/solar EM effects on nature as a whole. > > > On Sep 18, 8:12 pm, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > You are also leaving out of your equations the advancement of the nano > > > technologys Something like this would be perfect in which to power a > > > nano > > > device since they run on such lower level voltage energys. > > > > On Sep 17, 7:56 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Far from writing the subject off - I actually made measurements to > > > > verify. > > > > I've a pic of the meter showing level and includes the tree leaf which > > > > i would like identifying. > > > > Probably an Acer- I will post later. > > > > That power source capacity was/remains very low- though further work > > > > is possible; > > > > In matters like this, being lay or not doesn't make much difference- > > > > In fact, remaining objective is part of the job of sensible > > > > investigating. > > > > > On Sep 18, 2:35 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Sorry Trec that fake cricket sound was no tree creaking I am 50 yrs > > > > > old n I > > > > > have heard my share of trees creak. Even the high school students > > > > > knew the > > > > > sound was a fake of somekind who just happened to be passing by. The > > > > > recording repeated itself by stopping and starting numerous times > > > > > > Sorry Trev but I am not going to write this one off just because at > > > > > first glance > > > > > you see no revelance cause from my point of view their is quite a > > > > > major > > > > > factor of relevance > > > > > > On Sep 17, 7:38 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote:- Hide quoted > > > > > text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
