I wrote a set of python bindings for libcgroup v1 about 5 years ago,
and abandoned it because I couldn't find anybody interested in using
cgroups at the time.

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:40 AM Brock Palen <bro...@umich.edu> wrote:
>
> Thanks,
>
> yeah I was looking for an API that would take into consideration most cases, 
> like I find with hwloc-bind --get   where I can find the number the process 
> has access to.  Wether is cgroups,  other sorts of affinity setting etc.
>
> Brock Palen
> IG: brockpalen1984
> www.umich.edu/~brockp
> Director Advanced Research Computing - TS
> bro...@umich.edu
> (734)936-1985
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 12:37 PM Guy Streeter <guy.stree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I forgot that the cpuset value is still available in cgroups v2. You
>> would want the cpuset.cpus.effective value.
>> More information is available here:
>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.html
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:19 AM Guy Streeter <guy.stree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > As I said, cgroups doesn't limit the group to a number of cores, it
>> > limits processing time, either as an absolute amount or as a share of
>> > what is available.
>> > A docker process can be restricted to a set of cores, but that is done
>> > with cpu affinity, not cgroups.
>> >
>> > You could try to figure out an equivalency. For instance if you are
>> > using cpu.shares to limit the cgroups, then figure the ratio of a
>> > cgroup's share to the shares of all the cgroups at that level, and
>> > apply that ratio to the number of available cores to get an estimated
>> > number of threads you should start.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:40 AM Brock Palen <bro...@umich.edu> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Sorry if wasn't clear, I'm trying to find out what is available to my 
>> > > process before it starts up threads.  If the user is jailed in a cgroup 
>> > > (docker, slurm, other)  and the program tries to start 36 threads, when 
>> > > it only has access to 4 cores, it's probably not a huge deal, but not 
>> > > desirable.
>> > >
>> > > I do allow the user to specify number of threads, but would like to 
>> > > automate it for least astonishment.
>> > >
>> > > Brock Palen
>> > > IG: brockpalen1984
>> > > www.umich.edu/~brockp
>> > > Director Advanced Research Computing - TS
>> > > bro...@umich.edu
>> > > (734)936-1985
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:34 AM Guy Streeter <guy.stree...@gmail.com> 
>> > > wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> My very basic understanding of cgroups is that it can be used to limit
>> > >> cpu processing time for a group, and to ensure fair distribution of
>> > >> processing time within the group, but I don't know of a way to use
>> > >> cgroups to limit the number of CPUs available to a cgroup.
>> > >>
>> > >> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 8:56 AM Brock Palen <bro...@umich.edu> wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Hello,
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I have a small utility,  it is currently using  
>> > >> > multiprocess.cpu_count()
>> > >> > Which currently ignores cgroups etc.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I see https://gitlab.com/guystreeter/python-hwloc
>> > >> > But appears stale,
>> > >> >
>> > >> > How would you detect number of threads that are safe to start in a 
>> > >> > cgroup from Python3 ?
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Thanks!
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Brock Palen
>> > >> > IG: brockpalen1984
>> > >> > www.umich.edu/~brockp
>> > >> > Director Advanced Research Computing - TS
>> > >> > bro...@umich.edu
>> > >> > (734)936-1985
>> > >> > _______________________________________________
>> > >> > hwloc-users mailing list
>> > >> > hwloc-users@lists.open-mpi.org
>> > >> > https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/hwloc-users
>> > >> _______________________________________________
>> > >> hwloc-users mailing list
>> > >> hwloc-users@lists.open-mpi.org
>> > >> https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/hwloc-users
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > hwloc-users mailing list
>> > > hwloc-users@lists.open-mpi.org
>> > > https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/hwloc-users
>> _______________________________________________
>> hwloc-users mailing list
>> hwloc-users@lists.open-mpi.org
>> https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/hwloc-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> hwloc-users mailing list
> hwloc-users@lists.open-mpi.org
> https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/hwloc-users
_______________________________________________
hwloc-users mailing list
hwloc-users@lists.open-mpi.org
https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/hwloc-users

Reply via email to