ya, thats my dream sequncer. something like the rm1x, but with the
ability to record on the fly, either step, grid, or from midi in.
I was actully writing a software sequencer to do something like this a
few years ago, but the task was big enough that I had to decide what I
wanted to create, music, or programs. I opted for music. So, till
someone out their does somethign like this, im working with the
limitations...
On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, Scott Kellogg wrote:
> Man, that would kick serious butt. Recording sequences on the fly as you
> perform would be an improvisor's dream come true. I might have to get a
> FutureRetro FR-777 someday just for that.
>
> Scott Kellogg
> www.mp3.com/tabularaza
> listen to: hiq.suso.org
>
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, Dizzy J. wrote:
>
> > > i don't see why they didn't give it a system that can be easily
> > > upgradeable - like my Nova or my Akai sampler - i wish companies would
> > > focus on making great products instead of listening to the marketing
> > > departments who tell them - "no no - too many features... the user won't
> > > buy the next model if we give them that..."
> >
> > well, my own take on the subject. I like discreet components. I tried
> > using all in one type machines before, but their limitations were
> > too..well...limiting.
> >
> > I'd presonally prefer it if the rm1x(possibly 2x) would ditch the sound
> > engine all together and work on the sequencer more. If it could enter and
> > leave record mode WITHOUT having to stop the sequencer, then it would be
> > the ultimate live tool.
> >
>
