For the archive DB2 support ask for a DCR to cover this issue. Will do this week. Will also check with Websphere MQ support.
Roland -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Peter Relson Gesendet: Montag, 18. Juli 2005 13:23 An: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Betreff: Re: VSMLIST OWNCOMM DETAIL >Is OG orphaned storage (Memory leak) or still owned by someone? The owner is always the owner assigned when the storage was obtained. OG is far from always being "orphaned". It just might be misclassified. If you get storage and terminate and expect to use that storage later then you ought to be using OWNER=SYSTEM. >I now have a similiar issue with DB2 and Websphere MQ, It seems most of them >happen if the memory allocation is done while HASN <> PASN. Sounds like they do not specify OWNER=PRIMARY as they should if the intent is to mark the storage as owned by them. >Is there a performance issue to omit the OWNER=PRIMARY keyword? No, nor is there a performance issue to include it. Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
