Never seen a problem with either format. Been around Rexx sin
Ricck,

Never seen a problem with either format. Been around Rexx since 1984....
 
Scott J Ford
www.identityforge.com
 




________________________________
From: Rick Fochtman <rfocht...@ync.net>
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 4:44:12 PM
Subject: CLIST/REXX Library Formats

I'm involved in a discussion (read "argument") with co-workers where I'm 
currently doing a consulting gig.

Which is more effieient for CLIST/REXX libraries? the choices are "RECFM=FB, 
LRECL=255" or "RECFM=FB,LRECL=80"?

I lean toward the VB-format, btt I have at least one person here insisting that 
FB/80 is a "Industry standard" and is absolutely mandatory. The libraries are 
NOT LLA/VLF managed.

Opinions and/or criticisms, please.

Rick

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html





----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to