Gentlemen, I am indeed very grateful to you all and thank you all.
There is, indeed, compelling evidence supporting the case for fewer and even no LPARs but, unfortunately, it is proprietary and cannot be presented, for obvious reasons. I know that all sounds just a little too convenient, but it is true. But thank you all and rest assured I have, indeed, read and learned and appreciate very much all that you all have written and said. Please, no hard feelings. Thank you. On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Scott Rowe <scott.r...@joann.com> wrote: > That's your reply? IBM owes me money? Why? Because I did my job? > > Now you will probably go on to say that nobody has refuted your position, > right? > > Are you really interested in having an intelligent discussion here? You > seem to just be posting long diatribes and ignoring or dismissing all the > well thought out responses you receive. > > I'm still kind of curious what exactly you mean by: > - Performance: wasted CPU cycles especially for handshaking between > LPARs doing shared I/O > I have thoughts on what you mean by these kinds of things, but I am > reserving judgement. > > >>> George Henke <gahe...@gmail.com> 3/5/2010 12:15 PM >>> > >No, I'm saying that it's preposterous for you to say such a thing, > >because > I do not believe it is prevalent. . . . I recently was involved in > >situation where management was desiring to do such a thing, through >their > own ignorance of the technology, but I was able to defeat it. > IBM owes you money. > > > CONFIDENTIALITY/EMAIL NOTICE: The material in this transmission contains > confidential and privileged information intended only for the addressee. If > you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you have received > this material in error and that any forwarding, copying, printing, > distribution, use or disclosure of the material is strictly prohibited. If > you have received this material in error, please (i) do not read it, (ii) > reply to the sender that you received the message in error, and (iii) erase > or destroy the material. Emails are not secure and can be intercepted, > amended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. You are deemed to have > accepted these risks if you communicate with us by email. Thank you. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- George Henke (C) 845 401 5614 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
