Peter,
If the expectation is that PDSMAN's FASTCOPY replaces IEBCOPY, then yes, a
change to the $IEBCOPY statement in the parms could have an affect.

Determine the following
1)  Is there an LMP Key for FASTCOPY?
2)  What was the change that required NEWRULES?  Can you compare the
previous parm for PDSMAN with what went in with the NEWRULES?
3)  To truly eliminate FASTCOPY or PDSMAN, you would shut down the PDSMAN
STC and rerun the step.  Danger - if anything is using the FASTCOPY
functions, they will fail while PDSMAN is down.

I don't know of any conditions in PDSMAN that would produce an IEB1099E
message.  This may be pure IEBCOPY and not PDSMAN.  However, eliminating
PDSMAN will be good.

If you are getting the IEB1099E message - then is it possible that there is
a unique function in this one step.

I see there are 2 flavors or IEB1099.  There is IEB1099I and IEB1099E.

For IEB1099E it states:

IEBCOPY has found that it is not authorized. IEBCOPY must run from an
authorized library to use special I/O appendages.

I would see if that is the case as well.

Lizette


>  Peter wrote:
>
> 
> Lizette,
> 
> PDSMAN stc has not been shutdown since last weekend.  However in the
> joblog of the started task I see the following :
> 
> 10.59.17 STC32844 ---- FRIDAY,    16 APR 2010 ----
> 10.59.17 STC32844  PDSMOPR-00 Input -> NEWRULES
> 10.59.52 STC32844  PDSM00-34  PDSMAN RELEASE 7.60
> 
> The job steps at around this time are :
> 
> 10.59.22 JOB21391  -EOC004   BEBL3025 BASN121              04     85
> 10.59.22 JOB21391  IGD01008I SC : SYS10106.T105922.RA000.BEBL3025.R03
> 10.59.22 JOB21391  IGD01010I SG : SYS10106.T105922.RA000.BEBL3025.R03
> 10.59.23 JOB21391  +IEB1099E *** IEBCOPY IS NOT APF AUTHORIZED ***
> 10.59.23 JOB21391  -EOC004   BEBL3025 BASN121              08    105
> 
> Could the NEWRULES be the cause ?
> 
> Peter,
> 
> IEB1099I message only appears in the failing step's sysout ... It's
> interesting that it gets changed to IEB1099E with the same message text
> at
> the end of the sysout, but I guess that makes sense as you do want it
> to
> be an error message :-) ....
> 
> Kind regards,

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to