On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 09:46:59 -0500, John Hooper wrote: >will now cause failures. An improperly scheduled production job may cause >another to fail. Someone will have to scour syslogs to find those jobs. With >the front-end one job would just wait a little bit. This facility has saved >thousands of failures over the years. I assume others have had similar issues >and either use data isolation or a 2x4 over the head approach. It might be >worth a SHARE requirement to provide an exit point to address this problem. > At present, use of S99WTDSN is restricted to APF authorized jobs. A finer granularity of control by RACF, allowing certain jobs to use S99WTDSN with certain DSNAMEs might provide relief.
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
