> Where / what exactly are you reading and where? I have spent so much time in the past 48 hours with so many manuals I have no idea where I got that idea exactly. Sorry.
> Yes, via SMFPRMxx update and a SET SMF=xx command. Psychology question, not a technology question: In the opinion of the readers of this list, would most shops consider that a routine thing or would they consider it a potentially disruptive thing? In other words, if a vendor's documentation or support response said "update your SMFPRMxx and issue a SET SMF=xxx" would most shops be likely to say "oh, okay" or would most shops say "in your dreams -- we'll do this at the next scheduled IPL"? Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Mark Zelden Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 7:23 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: IEFU83, IEFU84 and IEFU85 On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 06:54:35 -0700, Charles Mills <charl...@mcn.org> wrote: > >If an exit is defined, you can assign a routine to it dynamically. The >question is if an exit is not defined, can you define it dynamically? My >reading is no, but I would love to be wrong. > Yes, via SMFPRMxx update and a SET SMF=xx command. Where / what exactly are you reading and where? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
