On 5 September 2010 18:13, Thompson, Steve <steve_thomp...@stercomm.com> wrote:
> I created a new thread out of this because I think this is a bit more > important a topic -- so why let it get lost in O/T IBM blah blah? > > Why is JES2 better than JES3? Why is JES3 better than JES2? > > Why would JES3 be preferred over JES2? Back in the 1970s, it was said that if you had two 168s, you should not even think about JES3, but if you had two 168s and a 158, JES3 would be OK because JES3 would consume a 158's worth of CPU time on its own, leaving the 168s to run the application workload. Tony H. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
