On 26 Mar 2011 15:42:24 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: >On 3/24/2011 1:19 PM, Clark Morris wrote: >> On 19 Mar 2011 06:55:11 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: >> >>> So (once again) the tech support bods (vendor and customer) are dancing >>> around on egg-shells trying to accommodate policy decisions made by >>> sales/marketing/legal droids. >> I consider the zIIP zAP thing something that may compromise security >> and which causes effort to be made just to save money. The effect may >> be to have people look at platform movement if they are going to have >> to rewrite/replace software to save money anyway. > >Compromise security? How?
My incomplete and possibly erroneous interpretations of past postings here led me to believe that zIIP and zAP work had to run in SRB mode and I also recall someone else claiming this was a security exposure. Despite having been an MVS (but not OS390 or zOS) systems programmer, my understanding of these issues is incomplete. On the other hand, as a person who worked for customers, I hate my employers being charged more to run that portion of my work that it costs less for IBM and ISVs to support. Clark Morris ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
