Turns out 1.12 was ACCEPTED. 1.10 was RECEIVED. I have applied the PTF on 1.10 test system with GROUPEXTEND. It's been SUPD. Test 1.10 IPL'ed OK. Needs testing.
-- John McKown Maranatha! <>< Sent from my Vibrant Android phone. On Jun 13, 2011 3:34 PM, "John McKown" <joa...@swbell.net> wrote: Someone asked what PTFs I missed that stopped our 1.10 to 1.12 upgrade. APAR OA32522. PTF ua54267 for 1.12 and ua54265 on 1.10 . I had neither one applied. This is my first sysplex upgrade and I am ignorant. Our test sysplex is a singe image sysplex and my usual tests showed no problems. I really don't much like our basic, 2 image, sysplex. It was forced due to politics. And the programmers still don't have want they argued for: a guaranteed amount of CPU during month end. They used to be in low importance WLM classes in an initiator. Now the initiators in their image are usually all drained to give their CPU to production. The only one who likes it is my manager, for system level testing of z/OS and program products. -- John McKown Maranatha! <>< ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
