never heard of either. where is that specified? On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 11:18 -0400, Ken Klein wrote: > Interesting John, as we are migrating v.10 to v.12 as well. But we are > still running con=shared and not con=(distributed,... > Did you go to "distributed" with your consoles? > > Kenneth Klein > kenneth klein tema toyota com > > > > John McKown <joa...@swbell.net> > Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu> > 06/13/2011 04:35 PM > Please respond to > IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu> > > > To > IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > cc > > Subject > 1.12 upgrade, required PTFs I missed. > > > > > > > Someone asked what PTFs I missed that stopped our 1.10 to 1.12 upgrade. > > APAR OA32522. PTF ua54267 for 1.12 and ua54265 on 1.10 . I had neither > one applied. > > This is my first sysplex upgrade and I am ignorant. Our test sysplex is > a singe image sysplex and my usual tests showed no problems. I really > don't much like our basic, 2 image, sysplex. It was forced due to > politics. And the programmers still don't have want they argued for: a > guaranteed amount of CPU during month end. They used to be in low > importance WLM classes in an initiator. Now the initiators in their > image are usually all drained to give their CPU to production. The only > one who likes it is my manager, for system level testing of z/OS and > program products. >
-- John McKown Maranatha! <>< ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
