Assuming there's nothing missing from this code sample, there are too few
entries in LISTECBS to satisfy the wait count (5).
Isn't WAITing in a CICS transaction frowned upon?
Bob
Jorge Arueira Campos wrote:
Hi all
A test of transaction(SUPX) under CICS V2.2.0, in instructions wait coded
below, down the CICS.
289 WAIT 5,ECBLIST=LISTECBS
290+* MACDATE 10/20/88
292+ LA 0,5(0,0) LOAD PARAMETER REG 0
294+ LA 1,LISTECBS LOAD PARAMETER R
295+ LCR 1,1 INDICATE ECBLIST USED
296+ SVC 1 LINK TO WAIT ROUTINE
LISTECBS DS A
DC X'80',AL3(WAITECB)
WAITECB DC F'0'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
