no wonder you are not naming them! An ugly way to catch a bad return code and an ugly way to abend a program. I have come to like EX 0,*, though it requires a base register.
IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU> wrote on 12/14/2006 05:14:02 PM: > A further thought, it might be intentional. This particular ISV has a > nasty habit of using 0C1 for debugging and as a response to unexpected > circumstances. Usually, there's at least an eyecatcher. ----------------------------------------- The information contained in this communication (including any attachments hereto) is confidential and is intended solely for the personal and confidential use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. The information may also constitute a legally privileged confidential communication. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or unauthorized use of this information, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message. Thank you ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
