On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 16:52:13 -0600, Rick Fochtman wrote: >Mark, I always renamed my DLIB datasets to a different HLQ, just to keep >them in a different catalog. That way, I could maintain multiple >targets, each with its own master catalog, and not have to worry about >whether the DLIBs were catalog-accessable from that image. >
So you had DLIB1.AMODGEN, DLIB2.AMODGEN, etc.? I'd rather catalog SYS1.AMODGEN on &SYSRn (whatever the DLIB volume is that corresponds to that target). And of course, for SMP/E, the DDDEFs all point to the volume serial. Another master catalog for each target zone? I see more problems than benefits. -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
