Tom Conley of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU> wrote on 03/28/2007 11:50:25 AM:
> This is a call to all the XEDIT freaks that have been punking ISPF the last > few days to put your money where your mouth is and submit some SHARE > requirements for the ISPF editor. I get sick and tired of all the XEDIT > freaks saying how XEDIT is way better than ISPF, but they never back it up > with specifics. If XEDIT was so great, submit requirements for ISPF so we > can get the features you want into the ISPF editor. Maybe XEDIT was better > because it used " and "" for Repeat and RRepeat block, or maybe it was > because copy and move targets used F for Following instead of A for After or > P for Preceding instead of B for Before. Real productive. > > So quit B&M'ing about how ISPF sucks compared to XEDIT, and submit some > requirements. If not, STF up. > > Regards, > Tom Conley I remember some XEDIT freaks raving about how you could split the screen vertically as well as horizontally x number of times each with it's own color scheme. And they had Rexx execs first. Regards, John K ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
