On 8 Aug 2007 18:27:44 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:

>Much of this thread is, as usual, uninformed and even radically ignorant.  
>Those who find the syntax of COND= uncongenial are---and have for many years 
>now been---free to use that of IF-THEN-ELSE instead.  (Since it inverts the 
>conventions of COND=, one or the other will presumably please everyone.)

I use it IF-THEN-ELSE when I can.   But if I am overriding a step in a
cataloged proc, I don't see that this is an option.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to