On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 10:00:05 -0500, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
>
>Try IRXJCL on for size, see if it fits your needs (watch the line wrap):
>
> http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/ikj4a370/12.2.1?SHELF=IKJ4BK70.bks&DT=20060626210253&CASE=
>
Wrap fixed, I believe. Get a better mailer. Often, when faced with this
problem, I trim the QUERY_STRING:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/ikj4a370/12.2.1
What's the advantage in IRXJCL? I know that when coding an EXEC for greatest
portability, I test it under all of:
o TSO TMP
o Unix shell
o IRXJCL.
... but I don't know who benefits from the last. I suppose it somewhat
verifies compatibility with the API.
I see Walt F. answered in anticipation my question of availability of
TSO TMP when user has no TSO segment. But why is this permitted?
Frequently, sysadmins ask on this list how to preclude a user's
access to Unix System Services. Simple answer: give the user no
OMVS segment, and define no default OMVS segment. But what answer
can be given the sysadmin who wants to preclude a user's access to
the TSO TMP? (Ignoring the question of why any sysadmin feels
compelled to limit access to either. Overzealous auditors?)
-- gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
