On Tue, 6 May 2008 12:53:57 -0500, Michael Babcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>As I understand it, IDMS specifically has a problem with NO. > As does CA-DATACOM the last I checked. There is an option to change it for current version(s?) (which we do for CA-11's DATACOM) but when our DBA checked into this last year we were warned of a performance impact in using the alternative option in our production online environment. If anyone has a large-ish (FSVO large) production DATACOM environment and has made that change, I'd be interested in knowing what performance impact if any it had and if any end users really noticed it or if it was measurable in terms of CPU usage etc. Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
