I guess we're just not as cautious as some shops. When I was a DBA we
routinely stopped databases we believed were no longer needed and waited
to see if anyone complained. I'm not a RACF person- I just see the
RDEFs used a lot when defining resources for MQ and DB2.
Rick Fochtman wrote:
-------------------------<snip>----------------------
I cannot believe how long this thread has lasted. Just RDEF the
resource and remove all privs. Wait to see who screams and you answer
your question. Does anyone else not use this method?????
-------------------------<unsnip>----------------------
It's not RDEF for DSN resources, Jim. Also, I strongl;y that it be
defined with "WARN", to avoid a possibly serious disruption, and as a
GENERIC, for performance. The risks are PROBABLY minimal in this
approach, and you can audit EVERYTHING, to catch both users and updaters.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html