The future is famously unpredictable. (No need to cite references.) The
best practice is to name *everything* as if you were part of a larger
enterprise even though you see no prospect of a change. Up to and including
the whole world. A lot of 'single system' shops over the decades have
suddenly found themselves absorbing--or being absorbed by--some other
entity. The last thing you want in the midst of such a traumatic event is
having to rename lots of stuff to avoid collisions.

Long ago IBM recommended imbedding the SHARE installation code (yea for
us!) into any name that has our could conceivably have an external face.
That goes for JES node names as well as network names. Act as if your
'single system' SMF data might one day be merged in with other systems to
provide a unified enterprise view. And you're still in the saddle.

Never take names lightly. Most especially, do not name things casually with
the expectation that you can always rename them later. Naming is one of the
biggest headaches in company mergers. Do your future self the favor of
taking great care today.

.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com


                                                                           
             Edward Jaffe                                                  
             <edja...@phoenixs                                             
             OFTWARE.COM>                                               To 
             Sent by: IBM              IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu                
             Mainframe                                                  cc 
             Discussion List                                               
             <ibm-m...@bama.ua                                     Subject 
             .edu>                     Re: JES2 Node Name                  
                                                                           
                                                                           
             01/02/2009 12:27                                              
             PM                                                            
                                                                           
                                                                           
             Please respond to                                             
               IBM Mainframe                                               
              Discussion List                                              
             <ibm-m...@bama.ua                                             
                   .edu>                                                   
                                                                           
                                                                           




George Dranes wrote:
> Considering our system is a monoplex and there is only on system in the
MAS,
> it would probably make much more sense for us to set the 3 values the
same.
> If in the future we decide to introduce a multisystem sysplex then we can

> rethink our NJE naming conventions.  Does this sound safe?
>

I would follow Mark Zelden's recommendation and name your node something
like WIUJES2A.

--
Edward E Jaffe

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to