Chris Mason wrote:
Bill
The key word here may be "exit".
(much snippage..)
>
> Thus, given the assumptions above, it is no surprise to me that RACF have
> not "revisited" the supplied assumed to be *sample* exit in order to ensure it
> conforms to the best coding practices probably several years on from when it
> was first offered to no doubt grateful system programmers needing a bit of
> help to get them started with their own efforts.
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:28:56 -0500, Bill Planer
wrote:
> >Before IBM makes a hardware change that impacts the performance of BAL/BALR,
> >perhaps they should scrape their macros clean of these instructions. I just
> >assembled an exit that uses the RACROUTE macro, and it still uses BALR
> >(z/OS 1.9).
Chris
perhaps you mean the keyword here was "macro".
Wasn't Bill referring to BALR within the RACROUTE macro, i.e. a supported
component of RACF.
Cheers
Roy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
